Current positionRevised proposal. Awaiting instructions.
PreparedA comparison. A reply. A conference brief.
Still outstandingThe latest bank statement.
Your agentic firm. Built for Alberta family law.
Inside the Harbour matter
Different work. The same connected record.
Changed instructions, missing disclosure and preparation for Thursday’s client conference. These examples show the work around a matter, not an MIT package or Court hearing.
NISIHarbour · Matter workspaceFictional example
01 · Changed parenting instructions
A proposal changes. Its meaning stays clear.
For counsel
Parenting proposal
Earlier proposalFriday 6:00 pm
Revised proposalFriday 5:00 pm
A proposed change. Not an agreement or order.
Alex’s email asks to review the revised draft at Thursday’s conference before it is circulated. There is no agreement to the revised time established in these sources.
Prepared correspondence · Internal draft
Reply to Alex
Dear Alex,
I have noted your proposed change to Friday at 5:00 pm. We will review the revised proposal at Thursday’s conference before it is circulated. Please also provide the latest bank statement when it is available.
No due date or procedural deadline is established by these example sources.
Prepared correspondence · Internal draft
Proposed disclosure follow-up
Dear Alex,
Please provide the latest bank statement referred to in your email, or let us know when you expect it to be available. It remains outstanding in the material prepared for our conference.
Walk in with the matter. Not a pile of loose ends.
Ready for review
Prepared work · Thursday, 10:00 am
Conference brief
Current position
Alex proposes a Friday handover at 5:00 pm, replacing the earlier proposed 6:00 pm. The revised time is not established as agreed.
Recent correspondence
The 9:14 am email asks that the revised draft stay internal pending review at Thursday’s conference. The latest bank statement is to follow separately.
Instructions required
Is 5:00 pm the position counsel should advance?
What, if anything, may be communicated after the conference?
When is the bank statement expected, and what follow-up is appropriate?
Outstanding disclosure
Latest bank statement · Not received. This remains open after the brief is reviewed.
Still openLatest bank statementWaiting on Alex Harbour. No receipt recorded.
Fictional demonstration. Nothing is sent, filed or scheduled. Resets when you reload.
These scripted examples show preparation and counsel review. Enabled workflows depend on the practice’s early-access setup.
FFP preparation
Less chasing. More practicing.
The Family Focused Protocol took effect on 2 January 2026. Its Regular Family Process includes Mandatory Intake Triage (MIT), settlement and, where needed, further case preparation.
NISI’s intended FFP workflow connects the incoming material, disclosure gaps, prepared work and counsel’s direction. For a small practice, that means one working record instead of repeatedly reconstructing the next step.
Know what is missing
Keep received material, outdated records and open requests distinct.
Prepare with context
Carry the latest instruction and supporting sources into the work for review.
Follow through
Bring decisions to The Line and keep unresolved work visible after direction.
Early access is presale. Scope and availability are confirmed for your practice; these examples do not demonstrate automated MIT filing or certify procedural compliance.
Alberta family-law practices are the initial early-access focus. The examples on this site reflect that starting point. They do not establish support for every practice area, jurisdiction or procedural workflow.
Does a revised proposal become the matter’s agreed position?
No. A proposal, an agreement and a court order are different things. In Harbour, the source establishes a proposed change and an instruction to keep the draft internal. Counsel still decides the position to advance and what may be communicated.
Does reviewing a brief close the issues inside it?
No. Review of the prepared brief is separate from resolution of the matter. The bank statement remains outstanding until its receipt or the appropriate next step is established. A review should not erase an open issue.
Keep the context. Move the work forward.
Follow Harbour into the decision, the draft and the source record behind both.